Instructional directive
Records what treatment the person accepts or refuses in described circumstances. Precise clinical triggers matter more than slogans such as “no heroic measures”.
Healthcare wishes for a time when you cannot speak
A living will records healthcare wishes for a future time when you cannot communicate. It is not a last will and testament, it does not distribute assets, and it is not a request for a healthcare practitioner to cause death.
South Africa has no dedicated statute that makes every living will automatically enforceable in every clinical situation. A clear, current and accessible directive can still provide important evidence of your wishes and should be discussed with your doctor.
Wills & Trust provides intake and consent-based referral support. Medical advice belongs to the identified treating practitioner. Legal advice and drafting belong to the identified attorney under a separate written engagement.

One name, two common functions
A living will is a written advance healthcare directive made while a person can understand and decide. It records preferences or refusals for defined future circumstances in which the person can no longer communicate or decide.
Records what treatment the person accepts or refuses in described circumstances. Precise clinical triggers matter more than slogans such as “no heroic measures”.
Section 7 of the National Health Act recognises a person mandated in writing to give consent when the patient cannot. A directive and a representative appointment should state clearly which function each document is intended to perform.
Two documents for different moments
| Question | Living will or advance directive | Last will and testament |
|---|---|---|
| When it speaks | While you are alive but cannot make or communicate the relevant healthcare decision. | After death. |
| What it addresses | Defined treatment wishes, refusals, care values and a possible healthcare representative. | Estate assets, heirs, executor, guardianship nominations and testamentary trusts. |
| Who needs it | Treating team, medical file, chosen representative and close support people. | Executor, Master and estate advisers after death. |
| Storage priority | Rapid access during illness or an emergency. | Secure custody of the signed original for the estate process. |
Do not hide the only advance-directive copy in the same place as an original last will if clinicians and family cannot reach it while you are alive.
The careful legal answer
Do not describe a South African living will as either worthless or automatically binding in every case. The legal position is more qualified.
The South African Law Reform Commission recommended statutory recognition, but the proposed legislation was not implemented. Current parliamentary records checked for this page do not show a dedicated advance-directive Act in force.
The National Health Act requires information about a user's right to refuse health services and generally prohibits health services without informed consent, subject to listed exceptions. Its emergency exception is also qualified where the user has refused the service.
Current Booklet 7 guidance encourages patients to record future-care directives, says an appropriately drafted living will may be used, and tells practitioners to respect a valid advance refusal when the patient cannot decide.
Why a document may not control the result
A clinician must assess the actual patient, law, professional duties and available evidence. A directive may carry less weight, or require urgent clarification, if its validity or meaning is uncertain.
The treating team does not know the directive exists or cannot obtain it when the decision is needed.
The wording does not identify the condition, treatment or circumstances to which the refusal applies.
There is a credible concern about capacity, coercion, identity, revocation, alteration or whether the document expresses current wishes.
The present facts do not match the stated trigger, the requested treatment is outside acceptable care, or compliance would be unlawful.
HPCSA guidance says significant disagreement should trigger clinical or ethical review and, if unresolved, legal advice about whether a court ruling is needed. A living will cannot compel treatment that falls outside acceptable standards of care.
Describe choices, not catchphrases
A template should not ask a person to make uninformed clinical choices. Discuss terminology, benefits, burdens and likely scenarios with an appropriate medical practitioner.
A living will is not automatically a clinical do-not-resuscitate order. Ask how treatment teams document resuscitation decisions for the relevant illness and setting.
Define the condition and prognosis that would make starting, continuing or stopping life-sustaining intervention relevant to your wishes.
This needs particular clinical care. HPCSA guidance recommends relevant expert input when withholding or withdrawal is considered.
Refusing a burdensome intervention does not mean refusing all care. Pain relief, symptom control, dignity, communication and support should be addressed separately.
A refusal document has limits
It cannot require a practitioner to cause death, provide active euthanasia or assist suicide. Refusing treatment and requesting appropriate palliative care are different from asking someone to end a life.
A directive cannot force a healthcare team to provide treatment outside acceptable professional standards or a service the facility cannot lawfully provide.
If you retain decision-making capacity, your informed current decision controls. The advance document is for a future loss of capacity or communication.
It cannot appoint an executor or decide inheritance. Those matters need a valid last will and testament.
Make the document usable
Ask your doctor about likely future decisions, clinical language and how the directive will be added to your medical record.
Identify yourself, capacity, values, defined triggers, treatment choices, representative role, revocation and signature details.
Use independent adult witnesses and consider medical confirmation of capacity where illness or later dispute makes this sensible. These are prudent safeguards, not a claim of universal statutory formalities.
Give copies to the people who may need them, record the location and revisit the document after health or relationship changes.
Evidence that strengthens the instruction
Because there is no single dedicated statute prescribing a universal living-will form, do not market one unofficial checklist as guaranteed legal validity. A specialist should consider the document and clinical context.
Use a template as a discussion tool
Wills & Trust does not currently publish an unreviewed downloadable form. A generic download can be a useful prompt, but it should not replace a conversation about your health, the wording and who will act.
A person and a document solve different gaps
A written instruction cannot anticipate every decision. A suitable representative can communicate with the treating team about matters not answered clearly in the directive.
The person should understand your current wishes, tolerate difficult conversations, ask for explanations and separate your values from their own.
Identify the representative and any substitute, state the intended scope, obtain acceptance and provide the document to the medical team. Ordinary financial powers of attorney are a different subject.
The best document is useless if nobody can find it
Ask for the current signed version and representative details to be placed in the relevant medical record.
Give the chosen person an accessible copy and discuss the actual choices, not only the document location.
Tell appropriate family or support people that the directive exists, which version is current and who holds it.
Keep a secure copy and an emergency note or device record that identifies the document and contact person without exposing unnecessary medical data.
Sharing health information is a privacy decision. Distribute only what is needed, keep a list of recipients, and retrieve or replace obsolete copies when the directive changes.
Keep the instruction current
Review after a diagnosis, material change in prognosis or treatment, marriage or separation, death or unavailability of the representative, family conflict, relocation, or a change in your own values.
From questions to a usable record
Separate the advance directive, healthcare mandate, last will, organ-donation choices and clinical orders.
A practitioner explains treatment terms and helps connect choices to realistic clinical situations.
An attorney checks identity, capacity evidence, refusal language, mandate scope and consistency.
Complete the document, distribute it appropriately and establish a review trigger.
No universal price or turnaround is promised. The identified provider must confirm scope, fee, timing, documents and responsibility before work starts.
Verify the people responsible
An HPCSA-registered medical practitioner should explain the clinical choices relevant to the person's condition and record the healthcare discussion. Verify the practitioner on the HPCSA register.
An admitted South African attorney with relevant health-law experience should take responsibility for legal advice and document drafting. Verify the person on the Legal Practice Council register.
Future clinicians remain responsible for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options, consent, records and professional decisions in the real clinical circumstances.
Wills & Trust performs intake, factual qualification, scheduling and consent-based referral. It is not the medical practice, law firm or treatment decision-maker.
No invented outcome
No verified Wills & Trust client testimonial or advance-directive treatment outcome is presented on this draft page. A past story cannot guarantee what a different hospital, clinician or clinical situation will require.
Useful evidence is a clear current document, recorded discussion, appropriate capacity safeguards, accessible copies, verified professional credentials and an identified representative who understands the person's wishes.
Questions before signing
A living will is commonly used for an advance directive that records future healthcare instructions. Advance-care planning may also include a written mandate appointing a healthcare representative.
No dedicated statute prescribes a universal attorney requirement, but legal review can improve clarity, mandate scope and capacity evidence. Medical discussion is equally important because the document deals with treatment choices.
Family views may affect a difficult real-time dispute, but they do not automatically erase a valid refusal. A clear, current and accessible directive, a representative and prior family discussion reduce uncertainty.
Not automatically. A do-not-resuscitate decision is a clinical order recorded for a particular care setting. Discuss how your broader directive should connect to current medical records and orders.
No. It may record treatment refusals and palliative-care wishes. It cannot require a practitioner to cause death or perform unlawful conduct.
There is no universal statutory interval. Review after material health, treatment, relationship or representative changes, and periodically confirm that the current document still expresses your wishes.
Start with a scoped conversation
Tell us what stage you are at and which kind of professional input you need. Do not submit diagnoses, medical records or treatment instructions through this intake form.
This enquiry does not create an attorney-client, doctor-patient or healthcare-representative relationship.
This page provides general South African information. It is not a living will, medical advice, diagnosis, treatment plan, consent decision, legal opinion, capacity assessment or emergency service.
A real decision depends on current wishes, capacity, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options, the directive, available representatives, law, professional guidance and the clinical setting. Discuss it with an appropriate doctor and attorney.